Miranda v. Law Office of D. Scott Carruthers et al
Plaintiff: Damian M. Miranda
Defendant: Law Office of D. Scott Carruthers and Dennis Scott Carruthers
Case Number: 1:2010cv01487
Filed: August 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/9/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE: Accordingly, defendants, have not filed the form, Consent/Decline, why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the Court's September 14, 2011, Order and the veral consent during a hearing on October 21, 2011 before Judge McAuliffe. Written response to OSC due by 12/1/2011. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/9/2011. (Herman, H)
August 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses and Production of Documents 35 . ORDER Reserving Plaintiff's Request for Imposition of Payment of Expenses, Including Attorney's Fees. signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/26/2011. (Herman, H)
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Re: Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Strike and 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/3/2011. (Figueroa, O)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Re Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Motion For Partial Summary Judgment, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 5/23/2011. (Plaintiff's motion to strike is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed form of order consistent with this memorandum decision within five (5) days following electronic service of this memorandum decision.)(Gaumnitz, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miranda v. Law Office of D. Scott Carruthers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damian M. Miranda
Represented By: Elizabeth Jane Arleo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Law Office of D. Scott Carruthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Scott Carruthers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?