Chavarria v. Green et al
| Anthony Chavarria |
| Green, Wilson, Dr. Duenas and Dr. Igbinosa |
| 1:2010cv02324 |
| December 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/8/2016. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
49
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to 1 Dismiss Case, with Prejudice, for Failure to Obey Court Order and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 01/21/2015. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 2/16/2016.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To File Opposition Or Statement Of Non-Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Within Thirty Days (ECF No. 41 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/28/2015.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 31 ),ORDER Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss (Doc. 24 ), ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims For Damages Against Defendants In Their Official Capacities From This Action, ORDER Requiring Defendants To File Answer Within Thirty Days, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/19/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) 24 Motion to Dismiss be Granted in Part and Denied in Part; Objections, if any, Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/10/2015. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 3/16/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER VACATING 27 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of October 30, 2014 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/1/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
27
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case for Failure to Obey Court Order 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/29/14. Objections if Any, Due in Twenty Days. Referred to Judge O'Neill. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/8/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court's order of January 22, 2014; re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Anthony Chavarria ; referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 03/10/2014. Objections to F&R due by 4/14/2014 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER for this Action to Proceed Only Against Defendants Duenas, Green, and Wilson, on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Medical Claims and ORDER Dismissing All Other Claims and Defendants signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/16/2014. Defendant Igbinosa terminated. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
12
FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That This Action Proceed Only Against Defendants Duenas, Green, And Wilson, On Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Medical Claims, And That All Other Claims And Defendants Be Dismissed, Objections, If Any, Due In 30 Days (Doc. 1 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/4/2013. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 1/9/2014.(Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
