Carlos Flores v. White Warden
Plaintiff: Carlos Flores
Defendant: White Warden
Case Number: 1:2011cv00006
Filed: January 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 16 Case for Failure to Obey a Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/17/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/22/2011. (Flores, E)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/14/201. ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT to Plaintiff. (Consent or Decline due by 3/21/2011). (Lundstrom, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlos Flores v. White Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: White Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?