Barber v. King
Plaintiff: Scott Barber
Defendant: C. King
Case Number: 1:2011cv00130
Filed: January 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Gerald B. Cohn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim,signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/1/2012. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SUBMIT Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee within 45 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 1/28/2011. Motion for IFP/Filing Fee due by 3/21/2011. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Sant Agata, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?