Williams v. The State of California et al
Donald B. Williams |
The State of California, The Department of Corrections, K. Allison and Chief Medical Officer |
1:2011cv00182 |
February 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Michael J. Seng |
Oliver W. Wanger |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER denying 77 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/1/2015. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 75 ORDER striking 74 Motion to Vacate and Reopen Case signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/4/2015. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 71 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/24/2012 recommending that 45 MOTION to DISMISS be granted and the action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 11/12/2012. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 66 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion For New Counsel And Granting Plaintiff's Request To File A Supplemental Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (ECF No. 58 ), Supplemental Opposition Due Within Twenty-Eight Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/29/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 64 AMENDED ORDER Setting Telephonic Hearing, And Requiring Plaintiff's Appearance, ORDER Directing Clerk's Office To Serve Order On Plaintiff At California Men's Colony And To Serve Courtesy Copy On Litigation Coordinator At California Men's Colony, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/23/2012.(Telephonic Hearing set for 8/29/2012 at 10:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng) (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 62 AMENDED ORDER Setting Telephonic Hearing, And Requiring Plaintiff's Appearance, ORDER Directing Clerk's Office To Serve Order On Plaintiff At California Men's Colony And To Serve Courtesy Copy On Litigation Coordinator At California Men's Colony, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/21/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 56 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff's Attorney To File An Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss And Vacating FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS For Dismissal (ECF Nos. 45 , 50 & 52 ), Response Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/15/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 53 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff's Attorney to Respond to 52 Plaintiff's Motion for New Counsel Within Seven (7) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/21/2012. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 51 ORDER adopting 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 13 Motion for emergency injunction signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/10/2012. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 50 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 45 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that this Action be DISMISSED Without Prejudice re 15 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/4/2012. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 49 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Denial of Plaintiff's 13 MOTION for an Emergency Injunction, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/4/2012, referred to Judge O'Neil. Objections Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's attorney's request for authority to incur costs by appointed pro bono counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/27/2012. (Crouch, J) |
Filing 43 ORDER DENYING 23 Motion to Vacate, 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 27 Motion to Alter or Amended, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/05/2012. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 38 ORDER Requiring Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2012. (Responses Due Within Thirty Days.) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 31 ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/8/11. Attorney Rebecca C. Sudtell selected to represent Plaintiff Donald B. Williams. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 25 ORDER Adopting 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/12/2011. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 2 Plaintiff's Petition for an Emergency Injunction, signed by Senior Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/22/2011. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending the Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants re 15 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/26/2011. Referred to Judge Wanger. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 2 Plaintiff's Petition for an Emergency Injunction for Medical Care be DENIED Without Prejudice to Plaintiff's Right to Move Again in the Future if Medical Evidence Which Supports His Claims is Secured and Produces With Any Such Renewed Motion re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/26/2011. Referred to Judge Wanger. Objections to F&R due by 8/29/2011. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 16 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/8/2011. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 4 ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee by March 31, 2011 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 02/04/2011. Motion for IFP due by 3/31/2011. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.