Quady Winery Inc. v. Freixenet America, Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 1, 2012
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/1/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|April 6, 2012
ORDER After Settlement: parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety by 4/25/2012. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/5/2012. (Herman, H)
|January 23, 2012
Joint Stipulation and ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint and to Continue the Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines: 1) Defendants Freixent America, Inc., Freixenet USA, Inc. Freixenet S.A. response to the complaint extended f rom 1/23/2012 to February 23, 2012; 2) Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 2/6/2012 to March 7, 2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully p repared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format, to email@example.com. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/23/2012. (Herman, H)
|November 8, 2011
ORDER - Requirement for Mandatory Scheduling Conference with Judge McAuliffe - see attached. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/8/2011. (Herman, H)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?