Velasco v. Biter
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Santiago Velasco
Respondent: M. D. Biter
Case Number: 1:2011cv01952
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Modoc
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting Respondent's Motion To Dismiss The Petition (Doc. 13 ), ORDER Dismissing The Petition With Prejudice (Doc. 1 ) And Directing The Clerk To Enter Judgment, ORDER Declining To Issue A Certificate Of Appealability, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/5/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Fahrney, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Velasco v. Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Santiago Velasco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. D. Biter
Represented By: Robert Gezi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?