Aguilar v. Cate
| Ulices Aguilar |
| Matthew Cate |
| 1:2012cv00094 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Failure to Exhaust State Court Remedies 1 ; **ORDER DECLINING to Issue a Certificate of Appealability** and DIRECTING the Clerk to CASE CLOSED, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/10/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/21/2012 directing Clerk to re-seve 9 Order; granting Petitioner 10-days to withdraw unexhausted claims and seek a Kelly Stay; informational order to petitioner concerning Dismissal if unexhausted claims are not timely withdrawn. (Filing Deadline: 7/5/2012). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause 4 ; ORDER DENYING Petitioner's Motion to Stay the Petition Pursuant to Rhines v. Weber 8 ; ORDER GRANTING Petitioner Thirty (30) Days From the Date of Service of This Order to Withdraw Petitioner's Unexhausted Claims and Seek a Kelly Stay; INFORMATIONAL ORDER to Petitioner Concerning Dismissal if Unexhausted Claims Are Not Withdrawn, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/9/12. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER REQUIRING Petitioner to Submit Within Thirty (30) Days a Signed Declaration Concerning the Petition; ORDER to Petitioner to SHOW CAUSE no Later Than Thirty (30) Days After Service Why the Petition Should Not be Dismissed For Petitioner's Failure to Exhaust State Court Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/25/2012. (Show Cause Response Due by 2/29/2012; Signed Declaration Due by 2/29/2012.) (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aguilar v. Cate | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ulices Aguilar | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Cate | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
