Murillo v. The Fifth Appelate Court
| Ronald Coulard and Officials of Visalia |
| Cixto Cruiz Murillo |
| The Fifth Appelate Court |
| 1:2012cv00656 |
| April 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER Denying Petitioner's Request For Copies (Doc. 20 ), Informational Order Regarding Entry Of Judgment And Termination Of The Action (Docs. 18 - 19 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/2013. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
20
INFORMATIONAL ORDER Regarding Entry of Judgment and Termination of the Action signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/01/2012. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Construing 12 Document as a First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER Disregarding Petitioner's 13 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER Dismissing the 12 14 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without Leave to Amend; ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY and Directing the Clerk to Close the Case signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 07/20/2012. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:12-cv-1028 JFM) to Fresno (1:12-cv-0656 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/24/12. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
