Slade v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sherry Slade
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2012cv01253
Filed: July 31, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER GRANTING 34 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/25/2015. (Jessen, A)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/29/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Hall, S)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING 30 Motion for Attorney Fees, in the modified amount of $7,243.95 and ADOPTING 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/28/2014. (Martin-Gill, S)
February 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/13/2014. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Hall, S)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Directing Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 USC 405(g), and Directing Entry of Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Sherry Jo Slade and Against Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/5/2013. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due in Fourteen Days. (Sant Agata, S)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Request for Extension of Time 20 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/28/2013. (Hall, S)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DENYING a Third Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/23/2013. (Kusamura, W)
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING a Second Extension of Time re 13 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/25/2013. (Hall, S)
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/12/2012. (Hall, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slade v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Slade
Represented By: Sengthiene Bosavanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Patrick William Snyder, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?