Santos v. Holland et al
| Matta J. Santos |
| K. Holland and Matthew Cate |
| 1:2012cv01651 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/10/2017 clarifying issue on which certificate of appealability is granted 51 . (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
43
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Denial of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Objections Due within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/10/2017. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 2/13/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER for Supplemental Briefing, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/9/16. Reply to Traverse Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/23/2012 recommending that action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 11/29/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Document # 2 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/17/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
