Phelps v. Cate, et al
| Mark Raymond Phelps |
| Matthew Cate, Kristofer Campbell, Jordan Dalton, Steve Gurule, Elizach Rangel, David Stinson, Derrike Wadkins and Mike Stainer |
| 1:2013cv00309 |
| March 4, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 21 Motion to Amend the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/14/15. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Striking 16 Supplement to First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/12/15. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that action be DISMISSED with prejudice, that dismissal count as a strike pursuant 28:1915(g), and that the Clerk of the Court terminate any and all pending motions and close the case re 14 Amended Prisone r Civil Rights Complaint filed by Mark Raymond Phelps, 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Mark Raymond Phelps ; referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/28/2015. Objections to F&R due by 5/15/2015 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/5/13: Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
