Dillman, et al. v. Tuolumne County, et al.
| Michael Dillman and Stephen Dillman |
| Tuolumne County and David Vasquez |
| 1:2013cv00404 |
| March 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tuolumne |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
JUDGMENT dated *5/11/15* in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS in Limine and Objections to Plaintiff's Exhibits, Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/6/2015. (Arellano, S.)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER on DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE and SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. A hearing on all outstanding issues is set for 5/4/2014, at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/24/2015. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART re 86 Motion for Summary Judgment re Defendants', signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/27/15. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ACCEPTING Plaintiffs' Late-Filed 94 Opposition; VACATING Hearing; EXTENDING Defendants' Time to Reply; and WARNING Plaintiffs' Counsel About Compliance With Local Rules, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/26/2015. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER DISCHARGING the Order to Show Cause, document 84 , as defendants have submitted a response, document 85 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/31/2014. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions should not be Imposed for Failing to Appear at Settlement Conference; Show Cause Response due by 12/12/2014 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/2/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
77
Memorandum Decision And ORDER Re Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 72 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/23/2014. Because there are no factual allegations against the County, the Countys motion has merit and is therefore granted. For that reason, the Court need not address any of the other substantive issues raised by the County. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the FAC as against the County WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to enter judgment against Plaintiffs and in favor of the County. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 58) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 30, 2014. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Amend the Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/21/2014. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/23/2013. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING 31 Plaintiffs' ex-parte motion and modifying the scheduling order to allow Plaintiffs a 30 day extension of time to file either a stipulation or a motion to amend the complaint. Plaintiffs shall file either a stipulated amended complaint or a motion to amend by no later than December 23, 2013. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/27/2013. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 16) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on July 22, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 9 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 7, 2013. (Munoz, I)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
