F., et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
Plaintiff: Amber Moore and J. F.
Defendant: McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv01699
Filed: October 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Remand the Action to Kern County Superior Court; ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to Close the Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/16/2014. Copy of remand order sent to Kern County Superior Court, case number S-1500-CV-279990 DRL. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue the Remand Hearing re 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/27/2013. Hearing on Motion to Remand 6 CONTINUED to 1/14/2014 at 08:30 AM at the United States Courthouse, 510 19th Street (JLT), Bakersfield, before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Appearances via CourtCall are authorized. (Hall, S)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to VACATE Hearing With Filing of Remand Motion, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/27/2013. (This Court is unable to address McKesson's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings until this Court's jurisdiction and remand issues are resolved. As such, this Court VACATES the 1/8/2014 hearing on McKesson's motion for judgment on the pleadings before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, and ORDERS the parties not to appear on 1/8/2014. If remand is denied, McKesson may reset a hearing on its motion for judgment on the pleadings before U.S. District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill in compliance with minimum notice required by Local Rule 230(b).)(Gaumnitz, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: F., et al. v. McKesson Corporation, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKesson Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Represented By: Kendra L. Orr
Represented By: Donald Frederick Zimmer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Moore
Represented By: Ruth Thi Rizkalla
Represented By: John Hamilton Gomez
Represented By: James Sizemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. F.
Represented By: James Sizemore
Represented By: Ruth Thi Rizkalla
Represented By: John Hamilton Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?