Bonilla v. Brazelton
| Julio Cesar Bonilla |
| Paul D. Brazelton |
| 1:2013cv01710 |
| October 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION that the Court Deny Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/1/17. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DIRECTING Respondent to Supplement the Record, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 02/14/2017. (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Amend Caption, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/27/17. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER DISMISSING AS MOOT Petitioner's 32 Motion to File a Lengthy Traverse signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/8/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER scheduling the filing of Petitioner's Traverse signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/24/2014. (Traverse Filing Deadline: 12/29/2014). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Construing Petitioner's Supplemental Traverse and Request 24 to be (1) Objections to the Findings and Recommendations to Deny Petitioner's Motion for a Stay 21 and (2) a Motion to Amend the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER Scheduling Reply to the Objections and Briefing on the Motion to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/14/14.(Case Management Deadline: 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Petitioner's Motion for a Rhines Stay be DENIED; Previously suspended deadline for the filing of Petitioner's Traverse be set for no later than thirty (30) Days after service of the Court's order denying Petitioner's Motion for a Stay re 14 MOTION filed by Julio Cesar Bonilla ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/15/2014. Objections to F&R due by 10/20/2014 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting Petitioner's 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Traverse and Suspending the Filing of the Traverse Pending Input on Petitioner's Motion for a Stay; ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Petitioner's 14 Motion for a Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/24/14. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bonilla v. Brazelton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Julio Cesar Bonilla | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Paul D. Brazelton | |
| Represented By: | William Ke-Wei Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
