Flores v. Chiles Bar And Grill et al
Plaintiff: Moses Flores
Defendant: Chiles Bar And Grill and Colin Butterfield
Case Number: 1:2013cv01783
Filed: November 4, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Gary S. Austin
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of case for failure to prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/9/2017. Matter is referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due by 1/26/2017. (Rosales, O)
May 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 1) This action proceed on Plaintiff's TAC on Plaintiff's Title VII discrimination claims based on disparate treatment, a hostile work environment, and retaliation including wrongful termination against Defendant Chili's (Doc. 34 ); 2) Plaintiff's Title VII claims based on a theory of constructive discharge be dismissed with prejudice; 3) Plaintiff's claims under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights be dismissed with pr ejudice; and 4) Defendant Butterfield be dismissed from this action with prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to state any cognizable claims against this Defendant. Matter referred to District Judge Dale A. Drozd; with objections to the findings and recommendations due within thirty days of service of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/3/2016. (Rooney, M)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Reissuing Magistrate Judge's October 9, 2015 30 ; ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to File a Third Amended Complaint, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/2015.( Amended Complaint due by 1/30/2016) (Martin-Gill, S)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DISMISSING Second Amended Complaint WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 26 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/1/2015. Amended Complaint due by 10/5/2015. (Martinez, A)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING 1 COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/16/2014. First amended complaint due within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order.(Martinez, A)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 First Informational ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/11/2013. (Martinez, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Chiles Bar And Grill et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Moses Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chiles Bar And Grill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colin Butterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?