Sokolsky v. State of California et al
Mark S. Sokolsky |
State of California, Christine Mativo, Rebecca Domrese, Audrey King, Alan Carlson, Brian Bowley, Marisa Bigot and Kamala Harris |
1:2013cv02044 |
December 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Dennis L. Beck |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER DENYING Substitution of Attorneys; ORDER for Clerk to Reflect That Plaintiff is Proceeding Pro Se, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/29/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 91 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be Dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court's Order of August 17, 2017; re 30 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Mark S. Sokolsky ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/8/18. Objections to F&R due by 1/25/2018 (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 90 ORDER VACATING Findings and Recommendations Entered on September 21, 2017 85 ; THIRTY DAY DEADLINE to File Opposition or Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/31/17. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 88 ORDER STRIKING 87 Objections for Lack of Appropriate Signature; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Twenty Days in which to File New Objections Bearing his Handwritten Signature; Twenty-Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/12/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 85 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be Dismissed based on Plaintiff's Failure to Obey the Court's Order of August 17, 2017 84 ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/21/17. Objections to F&R due (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 84 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment within Twenty (20) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/17/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 81 ORDER DISCHARGING 79 Order to Show Cause; ORDER DISMISSING Defendant Rebecca Domrese from this Action; ORDER for Clerk to Reflect Dismissal of Defendant Domrese on the Court's Docket signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/14/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 80 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request for Service by the Court and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Stay re 72 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/6/2017. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 79 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT REBECCA DOMRESE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/7/2017. Show Cause Response due by 7/31/2017. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 78 ORDER vacating hearing on 61 Motion for Summary Judgment from Court's Calendar signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/5/2017. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 77 ORDER Clarifying Plaintiff's Claims and Permitting Further Briefing on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/28/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 73 ORDER for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Objections within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/4/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 70 NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/3/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING 62 Second Motion to Modify Scheduling Order; ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment, Nunc Pro Tunc; ORDER EXTENDING Deadline for Parties to File Dispositive Motions, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/31/17. New Dispositive Motions Filing Deadline: March 31, 2017. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 60 ORDER GRANTING 55 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order; ORDER EXTENDING Deadline for Parties to File Dispositive Motions, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/21/16. New Dispositive Motions filed by 1/30/2017. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief and Punitive Sanctions 49 , 54 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/31/2016. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 57 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/27/2016 denying 44 Request for more definitive answer as moot. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 43 ORDER EXTENDING Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants King and Porter, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/30/2016. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 39 ORDER for Defendant: Audrey King and Jeannie Porter to SHOW CAUSE within (10) Days why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an answer; ORDERED that Defendants Winthrow and Coyne be DISMISSED from the action; ORDER re 35 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 05/24/2016. ( Show Cause Response (10) Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 36 Request to Correct Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/20/16. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 32 ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File Answer, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/11/16: Defendants Coyne, Winthrow, Meeks, and Bonsu are DIRECTED to file an answer within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order. Failure to comply with the Court's order may result in sanctions. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 28 Motion to Substitute Proper Parties as Defendants and Motion to File Second Amended Complaint; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Substitute Parties and File Lodged Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/16. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Default 22 , 23 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/5/16. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 23 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATION Recommending Plaintiff's Motion To Enter Default Be Denied (ECF No. 22 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/9/2015. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/28/2015 (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 18 ORDER Adopting Findings And Recommendation (ECF No. 16 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/12/2015. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Findings and Recommendations, filed August 18, 2015, are ADOPTED in full. This action is ORDERED to proceed on the following claims: (1) violation of Plaintiffs First Amendment rights to free exercise of religion by Defendants Mativo, Domrese, King, Bowley, and Bigot; (2) violation of RLUIPA by Defendants Mativo, Domrese, King, Bowley, and Bigot ; and (3) violation of Plaintiffs substantive due process rights by Defendants King, Mativo, and Domrese for conditions of confinement. The remaining claims, as well as Defendants State of California, Alan Carlson, and Kamala Harris, are DISMISSED from this action.(Fahrney, E) |
Filing 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED ON COGNIZABLE CLAIMS re 15 signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/18/2015. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 9/4/2015. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 13 ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Appointment Of Judges (ECF No. 12 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/11/2015. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 11 ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Expedite Proceedings signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/13/2014. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/13. (Verduzco, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.