Taylor v. Arakaki et al
| Latroy Taylor |
| Lance Arakaki, Andrew Elms, Lewis and Beroqouskya |
| 1:2014cv00479 |
| April 4, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/16/16. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint 26 and Motion for Free Copy of Court Document 27 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/3/15. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Provide Signature on 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint or Have Motion Stricken for Failure to Comply with Rule 11, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/20/2015. (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/5/15. (30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/07/15. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 16 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/03/15. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
