Sanchez v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Plaintiff: Eliazar Sanchez
Defendant: Frito-Lay, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00797
Filed: May 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER GRANTING 80 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, and 81 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs, Class Representative Incentive Award, and Settlement Administrator Costs signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/5/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2020. In Court Hearing set for 5/4/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Sant Agata, S)
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER GRANTING Preliminary Class Certification and ORDER DENYING Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 67 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/30/2019. (21-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES AND CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 65 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/2018. Good cause appearing and the parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff shall have until November 9, 2018 to file the motion for preliminary approval, and that the hearing on preliminary approval is continued to December 4, 2018. (Thorp, J)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE AND CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/31/2018. Good cause appearing and the parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff shall have until October 17, 2018 to file the motion for preliminary approval, and that the hearing on preliminary approval is continued to November 20, 2018. (Thorp, J)
June 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER Granting Joint 61 Stipulation to Extend Deadline and Continue Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/13/2018. (It is herebyordered that plaintiff shall have until 9/17/2018 to file the motion for preliminary approval, and that the hearing on preliminary approval shall be continued to 10/16/2018,at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Gaumnitz, R)
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULED HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL; Hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is set for 7/17/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/17/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
June 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying Renewed 43 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Conditional Class Certification, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/2017. (1. Plaintiff's renewed motion for preliminary settlement approval an d conditional class certification (Doc. No. 43) is denied; 2. The parties are granted leave to file a final motion for preliminary settlement approval and conditional class certification; and 3. The matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for further scheduling consistent with this order.) (Gaumnitz, R)
June 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Order Re: Stipulation To Continue Upcoming Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference is now set for August 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. A Joint Scheduling Conference Report carefully p repared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the previously served ORDER SETTING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE at least one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and shall be emailed, in Word format, to mjsorders@caed.uscourts.gov signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/07/2016. (Yu, L)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Denying 20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Conditional Class Certification, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/2016. (1. Plaintiff's 20 motion for preliminary settlement approval and conditional class certification is denied; and2. The matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for purposes of re-scheduling further proceedings in this action.)(Gaumnitz, R)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time to File Supplemental Motion For Preliminary Approval, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/16/2016. (1. Plaintiff shall file his supplemental motion for order granting preliminary approval of class action settlement, on or before 4/19/2016. 2. The hearing on plaintiff's supplemental motion shall be continued to 5/3/2016, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5. (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.)(Gaumnitz, R)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Trial Date and all Related Pre-Trial Dates, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/29/2016. (Pretrial Conference previously set for 4/25/2016, is CONTINUED to 11/7/2016, at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial previously set for 6/21/2016, is CONTINUED to 1/4/2017, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.)(Gaumnitz, R)
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Adopting 16 Findings and Recommendations in Full and Denying Plaintiffs' 9 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/26/2015. (Gaumnitz, R)
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Findings and Recommendations Recommending That Plaintiffs' Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement Be Denied 9 . Objections due by within fourteen (14) days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/05/2015. (Yu, L)
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order Re: Stipulation Regarding Extension of Time To File Supplemental Motion For Preliminary Approval. The Motion Hearing is now set for May 1, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/17/2015. (Yu, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eliazar Sanchez
Represented By: Jerusalem F. Beligan
Represented By: Brian D. Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frito-Lay, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Francisco De La Cruz
Represented By: Samantha D. Hardy
Represented By: Ashley Teiko Hirano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?