Scott Rankin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Scott Rankin |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2014cv00854 |
| June 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0427 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, Without Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/11/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER requiring Plaintiff to file opening brief signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/6/2016. (Opening Brief Filing Deadline: 7/27/2016).(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DISCHARGE Order to Show Cause (Doc. 16). ORDER DIRECTING Defendant to File Proof of Service of Administrative Record Within Five (5) days. ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff 60-Day Extension of Time to File and Serve His Opening Brief. (1) The Orde r to Show Cause issued on April 7, 2016, is DISCHARGED; (2) Within five (5) days of the date of this order, Defendant shall file a proof of service of the Administrative Record on Plaintiff at his address of record; (3) Within sixty (60 ) days following service of this order, Plaintiff shall serve and file an Opening Brief with the Court and on Defendant. Defendants responsive brief shall be filed with the Court and served on Plaintiff within thirty (30) days after service of th e Opening Brief. Plaintiffs reply brief, if any, shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendant within fifteen (15) days after service of Defendants responsive brief; and (4) Plaintiff is forewarned that his failure to file an Opening Brief in compliance with this Order will result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/20/2016. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed. Plaintiff shall file a written response to this order to show cause no later than April 21, 2016. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to respond to this order to show cause will result in the dismissal of this action. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/6/2016. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 3 , 4 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/16/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott Rankin v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Rankin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
