Rangel v. Chen et al
| Michael Rangel |
| Chen, Manasrah and Lopes |
| 1:2015cv01349 |
| September 3, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 34 Motion for Extension of Time; and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendant's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; Fourteen (14) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/26/2017. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Extension of Time; AND Denying Plaintiff's 30 Motion Requesting More Time for Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/27/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Service of Cognizable Claim Against Defendant Manasrah, and to Dismiss All Other Claims and Defendants with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/6/16. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/10/2015. Show Cause Response due : (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
