Guerra v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jesse Guerra
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2015cv01408
Filed: September 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Counsel's Motion for Attorney's Fees, 24 . Plaintiff's counsel's motion for an award of attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $24,000 is granted. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to refund to Plaintiff $6,000 of the section 406(b) fees awarded as an offset for the EAJA fees previously awarded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to refund to the Commissioner $6,000, the amount of administrative fees previously awarded pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 406(a). Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/28/2018. (Timken, A)
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION and ORDER for the Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses. Fees and expenses in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000.00) under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), shall be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/22/2016. (Timken, A)
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER on Plaintiff's Social Security Complaint 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/27/16: The Clerk of this Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jesse Guerra and against Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
June 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time. Defendant is granted an extension of time, up and including July 6, 2016, to file a responsive brief; and Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief on or before July 25, 2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/7/2016. (Timken, A)
June 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER on Stipulation for an Extension of Time. Defendant is granted an extension of time, up and including July 6, 2016, to file a responsive brief and Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief on or before July 25, 2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/6/2016. (Timken, A)
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Proceed IFP 2 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/18/15. (Hellings, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guerra v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Guerra
Represented By: Vijay Jagdish Patel
Represented By: Steven Gilbert Rosales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lynn M. Harada, GOVT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?