Acinelli v. Baniga et al
Plaintiff: Samuel A. Acinelli
Defendant: Ulysses Villamil Baniga, K. Hill, S. Shiesha and P. Nixon
Case Number: 1:2015cv01616
Filed: October 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 4/15/19.CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL; ORDER Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants; and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Assign Action Entirely to Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/8/2018. (Jessen, A)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant in Part and Deny in Part Defendants' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/09/2018. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 4/27/2018.(Flores, E)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Directing Clerk to Assign a District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Non-Cognizable Claims be DISMISSED re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/6/2018. This case has been assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. The new case number is 1:15-cv-01616-AWI-MJS (PC). Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/26/17: Clerk to Strike ECF No. 16 and Return to Plaintiff. (Hellings, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acinelli v. Baniga et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel A. Acinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ulysses Villamil Baniga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Shiesha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P. Nixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?