Hernandez v. DHS/ICE, et al.
Petitioner: Esteban Hernandez
Respondent: DHS/ICE and Lorreta Lynch
Case Number: 1:2015cv01829
Filed: December 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Adopting 48 Findings and Recommendations, Denying Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration 46 , Without Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/12/17. (Gonzalez, R)
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that as a Result of Petitioner's Failure to Prosecute this Case, the Court DISMISS With Prejudice the Motion for Reconsideration 46 in the Above-Captioned Action signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/20/2017. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that the Court Deny Petitioner's 46 Motion for Reconsideration of it's Order Dismissing Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/12/17. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/20/16. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motions for Reconsideration of Extension of Time 33 , 35 , 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/9/16. (Verduzco, M)
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 34 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/6/16. (Verduzco, M)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DENYING 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 02/16/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
December 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/15/15. (Verduzco, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hernandez v. DHS/ICE, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Esteban Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DHS/ICE
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorreta Lynch
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?