Wilson v. Pierce et al
Dennis Wayne Wilson |
D. Pierce, R. Mayo, T. Meighan, R Estrada, C. Anderson and Frazer |
1:2016cv00479 |
April 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Sheila K. Oberto |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's 16 Objections and Denying Reconsideration, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/24/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 15 ORDER on Plaintiff's Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/7/17. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Case as Barred by the Statute of Limitations and by Heck v. Humphry, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/24/17. 21-Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 10 ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed With Prejudice as Barred By The Statute of Limitations and By Heck v. Humphry, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997) 1 , 7 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/27/17: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/12/2016. (Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.