Cortinas v. McCabe, et al.
| Larry William Cortinas |
| Conall McCabe, Pierrette Lenoir, Olga Beregovskaya, Chetana Sisodia, Patricia Rouch, E Clark and Vogel |
| 1:2016cv00558 |
| April 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER that Inmate Larry William Cortinas, CDCR# P-09908 is no Longer Needed as a Witness in these Proceedings, and the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is DISCHARGED signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/23/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 01/11/2018. Settlement Conference set for 3/23/2018 at Corcoran State Prison before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 55 Request for Ruling; Denying Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Supplement; and Striking Lodged Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 01/09/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to grant Defendants' 41 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/28/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING 49 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Sur-Reply; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 41 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies be GRANTED re 13 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/13/2017. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time for Filing and Hearing Motion; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to: (1) DENY 24 Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and/or Protective Order; (2) DENY 32 Plaintiff's Moti on for a Court Ordered Telephonic Conference; (3) DENY 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; and (4) DENY 38 Plaintiff's Request for a Preliminary Injunction and a Temporary Restraining Order re 13 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/6/2017. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER (1) DENYING 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Proceed With Discovery; (2) DENYING 22 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; (3) DENYING 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order; and (4) DENYING 33 Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Conduct Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/1/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER RE Defendants' 17 Request for Clarification of Screening Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/17/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 11 : Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before January 6, 2017. The Court will not grant any further extensions of time. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this deadline, his case will proceed on only the claims found cognizable in the Screening Order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/2016. (Valdez, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
