Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
| Jamisi Jermaine Calloway |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. Gipson, T. Perez, J. C. Smith, M. T. Cisneros and M. Jennings |
| 1:2016cv01305 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/30/18. Objections to F&R Due Within Forty-Five Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/7/17. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Action Should not be Dismissed with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/24/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING 13 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Complaint With Leave to Amend, DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and DIRECTING Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/25/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
