Guillot v. Ferrell et al
| Frank Guillot |
| Terrence Ferrell and The United States Postal Service |
| 1:2016cv01307 |
| September 2, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/3/2017. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER SANCTIONING PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/14/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT REJECTED; The Defendant United States Postal Service is ORDERED to file its response to the Complaint in this action on or before August 25, 2017, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/15/2017. (Lafata, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ON RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER GRANTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT TERRENCE FERRELL, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/21/2017. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed Under Rule 4(m) and for Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/8/17: Show Cause Response due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 2/17/2017. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
