Hicks v. Mantevousian et al
| Marquis Hicks |
| Andre Mantevousian, Jose Santana and S. Putnam |
| 1:2016cv01440 |
| September 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER REOPENING ACTION; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss; Clerk of Court to ASSIGN a District Judge signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/10/2017. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due within Fourteen (14) Days. The new case number is 1:16-cv-01440-AWI-JLT (PC). (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Plaintiff's Failure to Obey the Court's Orders and to Prosecute This Action 8 , 9 , 10 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/24/17. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should not be Dismissed for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with the Court's Order and Failure to Prosecute this action,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/15/17. Show Cause Response due by 10/12/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 6 Motion for Legal Representation signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/26/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
