Mary J. Bryant et al v. Tulare County et al
| Mary J. Bryant and The Real Mooney Grove Project Inc. |
| Tulare County, Neil Pilegard and Phil Cox |
| 1:2016cv01542 |
| October 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 7 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be Dissmissed With Prejudict and Without Leave to Amend. Matter referred to Judge Oneill. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days of service of this recommendation; signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/17/2017. (Thorp, J)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING Complaint with 21 Days Leave to Amend; ORDER DENYING Emergency Temporary Restraining Order as Moot 5 . Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, consiste nt with this order, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file a timely amended complaint, Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application will be denied and this case will be closed without further notice. Plaintiff's "Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Motion Order Show Cause Preliminary Injunction" (Doc. 5) is DENIED as MOOT. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/29/2016. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
