Stinchecum et al v. Dollar General Corp.
John Stinchecum and Petra Stinchecum |
Dollar General Corp. |
1:2017cv00240 |
February 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Dale A. Drozd |
Michael J. Seng |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER to Show Cause ; ORDER VACATING September 12, 2018 Order to Show Cause Hearing; Imposing Monetary Sanction of One Hundred Fifty Dollars on James F. Tierney, III; ORDER VACATING 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS; and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to Close this Matter (Voluntary Dismissal), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/11/18. CASE CLOSED (Case Management Deadline: 9/21/2018) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 35 ORDER DISCARGING Order to Show Cause as to Defense Counsel Only, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/6/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 30 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO PERSONALLY APPEAR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel James Tierney and Jeffrey Lenkov SHALL PERSONALLY APPEAR on September 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. i n Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone to SHOW CAUSE why monetary sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply with the June 21, 2018, and August 1, 2018 orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/22/2018. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER FOR PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE DOCUMENTS. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of this order this action s hould not be dismissed as a sanction for the failure to file dispositive documents. The parties are advised that failure to comply with this order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/1/2018. (Hernandez, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER Requiring Parties to File Dispositional Documents 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/21/2018: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 24 Order regarding settlement conference procedures, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/3/2018. Settlement Conference set for 7/5/2018 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. At least five (5) court days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement in Word format directly to Judge Grosjeans Chambers at epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Rosales, O) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/9/2018. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE, COMPLETION OF EXPERT DISCOVERY, AND CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE currently set for 2/26/2018 to 4/5/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/18/2018. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION and ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; Settlement Conference CURRENTLY set for 10/12/2017 is CONTINUED to 12/21/2017 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/7/2017. (Bernacchi, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.