Barnett v. Fisher, Jr.
| Delbert Barnett |
| R. Fisher, Jr. |
| 1:2017cv01361 |
| October 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Madera |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER ADOPTING 48 Findings and Recommendations, GRANTING Defendant's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Plaintiff's DENYING 42 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/12/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
48
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 42 , 43 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/6/2020. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due within 21-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for Delbert Barnett, CDCR No. K-32774, Plaintiff to appear by Video Conference for Settlement Conference set for 9/24/2019 at 9:00 a.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/21/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER setting Settlement Conference and extending Stay of Action signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/19/2019. (Settlement Conference set for 9/24/2019 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Post-Screening ADR Project, GRANTING Defendant's 20 Motion for Extension of Time, and STAYING the Case for 90 Days signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/13/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDERED that this action shall proceed solely on the claim in plaintiffs second amended complaint against Warden R. Fisher, Jr. and Does 1 through 4 for deliberate indifference of plaintiffs safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment; ORDERED this matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/15/2019. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action Proceed on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Claim Against Defendants Fisher and Does #1-4 and to Dismiss All Other Claims and Defendants re 14 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/24/2018. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barnett v. Fisher, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Delbert Barnett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R. Fisher, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
