Howard v. Hildebrand et al
Plaintiff: Israel Howard
Defendant: M. Hildebrand, E. Garza, M. Marquez and Christian Pfeiffer
Case Number: 1:2017cv01397
Filed: October 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Stanley A. Boone
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed on July 18, 2018 20 , be granted on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust available administrative remedies and this action should be dismissed, without prejudice ; referred to Judge O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/14/18. Objections to F&R due 30-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S)
May 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Access to Law Library 8 , 9 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/4/2018. (Hellings, J)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/30/18. (Marrujo, C)
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/04/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 4/23/2018.(Flores, E)
December 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for an order directing that he be provided law library access 8 be Denied re 8 MOTION for Access to Law Library filed by Israel Howard ; referred to Judge Drozd; new case number is 1:17-cv-1397 DAD-SAB (PC), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/06/2017. Objections to F&R due by 1/11/2018 (Martin-Gill, S)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Hildebrand et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Israel Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Hildebrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Pfeiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?