Franco v. Espinoza
Petitioner: Maria Antonia Franco
Respondent: Janel Espinoza
Case Number: 1:2018cv00057
Filed: November 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Madera
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/22/2020. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER CONSTRUING 30 Motion for Relief as Motion for Extension of Time; ORDER GRANTING Petitioner Extension of Time to File Objections; Thirty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/21/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Denied with prejudice on the merits ; referred to Judge Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/5/19. Objections to F&R due :30-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Clarifying Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response re 21 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/22/19. (Gonzalez, R)
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for Dismissal of the Petition for Failure to Prosecute 15 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/14/2018. (Hellings, J)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Dismissal of Petition for Failure to Obey a Court Order; Court Clerk to Assign District Judge, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/9/18. This case is assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The New Case No. is: 1:18-cv-0057-DAD-SKO. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/23/2018: 15-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
January 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's 2 Motion to Stay and Abeyance;Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a status report within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order advising the Court of the status of the state court proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/24/18.Case Management Deadline: 30-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
January 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-2314 CMK HC) to Fresno (1:18-cv-0057 SKO HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/12/2018. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franco v. Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maria Antonia Franco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janel Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?