Petillo v. Galliger et al
| Isaiah J. Petillo |
| X. Galliger, M. Magana, Hernandez, L. Vasquez, Wilson and J. Fugate |
| 1:2018cv00217 |
| February 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 79 Findings and Recommendations In Full and GRANTING 57 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/19/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
79
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 57 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Remedies be Granted re 18 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/6/2022. Referred to Judge Thurston. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER DENYING 60 Motion to conduct depositions by written questions, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/10/2021. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING 59 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/10/2021. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER for Defendants to File Responsive Pleading within 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/8/2021. (Response Due: 30-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER VACATING 45 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 46 Motion to Extend Time to Pay the $400.00 Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 06/03/2021. Sixty-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to obey the Court's order issued on March 29, 2021 requiring him to pay the filing fee ;referred to Judge Unassigned DJ,signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/14/2021. (Objections to F&R due within 14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER declining to adopt Findings and Recommendations 41 and granting Motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status 31 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/26/2021. 30-Day Deadline for Plaintiff to pay $400.00 filing fee. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That 31 Defendants' Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's In Form Pauperis Status be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/8/2020. Referred to Unassigned DJ. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion for court to direct Defendants to file answer signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/22/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief as Moot, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/29/2018. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request to Add Exhibits to First Amended Complaint 17 ; ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint With Exhibits Attached, as Instructed by This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/27/2018: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending That Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief Be Denied 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/26/2018: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
