Shehee v. Lefors et al
Gregory Ell Shehee |
M. Lefors, J. Horton, M. Mims, Mendez, McCoy, Newell, Orr, Rolnds, N. Nguyen and Gill |
1:2018cv00233 |
February 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Stanley A. Boone |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, for Failure to Pay the $400.00 Filing Fee, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/9/18. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDER ADOPTING 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DIRECTING Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 Filing Fee within fourteen days from the date of service of this order or the action will be dismissed, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/23/18. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign a District Judge to This Action (This case has been assigned to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is 1:18-cv-00233-LJO-SAB); F INDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Plaintiff's Motion for In Forma Pauperis Application be Denied and Plaintiff be Directed to Pay the $400.00 Filing Fee, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/12/18. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.