Shepard v. Borum et al
| Lamont Shepard |
| M. Borum and J. Acebedo |
| 1:2018cv00277 |
| February 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference and Parameters and Scheduling Pre-Conference Telephone Discussion signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 0202/2023. Settlement Statement due by 2/27/2023; Status Conference set for 3/6/2023 at 01:00 PM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta; Settlement Conference set for 3/13/2023 at 10:00 AM in Yosemite (HBK) before Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 118 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 1/4/2023. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 113 114 Motions Demanding a Bench Trial signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/28/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 2/4/2022 setting Settlement Conference for 3/10/2022 at 09:30 AM Via Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER SCHEDULING Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/3/2021. Settlement Conference (Zoom) set for 1/25/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR AND STAY OF CASE FOR 30 DAYS; ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE DOCUMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 9/8/2021.(Stay Deadline: 30-Day Deadline)(Copy of this order, 13 , and 80 electronically served on Brian S. Chan and Lawrence Bragg)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 80 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DENYING Defendant's 65 Motion for Summary Judgment ;ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment ;ORDERED that the matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceeding, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/05/2021. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 82 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 8/2/2021. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
80
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny 65 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 07/13/2021. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen-Days. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Striking 21 Petitioner's Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 07/12/2021. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 73 Cross Motion to Strike signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 06/03/2021. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER ADOPTING 53 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment, and DENYING Plaintiff's 59 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/28/2020. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING 62 Defendants' Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/14/2020. Dispositive Motion deadline is hereby reset to 6/5/2020. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Directing Defendants to Correct Service and Extending the Deadline for Parties to Object to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 03/27/2020. Objections to F&R due within Fourteen-Days. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER ADOPTING 49 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 32 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/19/2020. (Rivera, O)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING IN PART Defendants' Motion to modify Discovery and Scheduling Order 42 ; DENYING Plaintiff's Motions regarding case status and movement 43 , 47 signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/5/2020. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER for Defendants to SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 29 should not be granted signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/2/2020. Show Cause Response due within 10-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING 22 Motions to Compel Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/17/2019. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 25 Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/21/19. (Due: 07/06/2019) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER withdrawing 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 7 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/4/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Assign District Judge; new case number is 1:18-cv-00277 DAD-MJS (PC); FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 7 be denied and that Plaintiff be required t o submit the filing fee within 14 days of the Order Adopting these recommendations re 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Lamont Shepard ; referred to Judge Drozd,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 03/20/18. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline(Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
