Acosta v. Santillan et al
| Jose Acosta |
| Olman Ayala, LLC, Eric Santillan and Eric Santillan Doing business as Mr Mango Antojitos Mexicanos |
| 1:2018cv00506 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2018 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Eric Santillan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Zachary Best* *332 N. Second Street* *San Jose, CA 95112*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Olman Ayala, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Zachary Best* *332 N. Second Street* *San Jose, CA 95112*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Jose Acosta. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7606437) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Best, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
