(PC) Peralta v. Swetalla et al
| Cion Peralta |
| L. Machado, J. Sebok, J. Swetalla, V. Powers and Xavier Cano |
| 1:2018cv01023 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Cion Peralta. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 3
SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT Plaintiff's Consent or Decline Due Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/17/18. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Cion Peralta. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Plaintiff's Consent or Decline Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Cion Peralta. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
RECEIPT number #CAE100039835 $400.00 fbo Cion Peralta, P-33314 by David Siemienski on 7/30/2018. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Xavier Cano, L. Machado, V. Powers, J. Sebok, J. Swetalla by Cion Peralta.(Gonzalez, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
