(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail
| Raymond C. Watkins |
| Tuolumne County Jail |
| 1:2018cv01426 |
| October 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Action Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Pay the Filing Fee or Submit a Complete In Forma Pauperis Application re #4 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/4/18. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty-One Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order to Show Cause, served on Raymond C. Watkins. (Gonzalez, R) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Raymond C. Watkins. (Gonzalez, R) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Regarding First Informational Order and Client Copy of Filed Suit, by Raymond C. Watkins. (Marrujo, C) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Raymond C. Watkins. (Lundstrom, T) |
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not Here: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Raymond Watkins. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to Napa State Hospital 2100 Napa-Vallejo Highway, CA 94558-6293 by Raymond C. Watkins. (Lundstrom, T) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Raymond C. Watkins. (Lundstrom, T) |
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Inmate no longer at Jail: #4 Order sent to Raymond C. Watkins. Notice of Change of Address due by 1/10/2019. (Lundstrom, T) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/17/2018. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form)(Flores, E)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Raymond C. Watkins. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Flores, E) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Raymond C. Watkins. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raymond C. Watkins. (Flores, E) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Tuolumne County Jail by Raymond C. Watkins.(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tuolumne County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond C. Watkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
