Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Robert Lawrence
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and First American Title Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv00302
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Referring Judge: Lawrence J O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The Court has received and reviewed the stipulation of the parties #8 regarding the pending motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Local Rule 144 and good cause appearing, Plaintiff's opposition to the motion to dismiss #4 is due on May 7, 2019, and Defendant's Reply is due on May 14, 2019. Upon expiration of the reply deadline, the Court will review the papers and will reset the hearing date if the Court believes a hearing would be helpful or necessary. Otherwise, the matter will be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 29, 2019. (Munoz, I)
April 26, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Continuance on Hearing on Motion to Dismiss re #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 MOTION to DISMISS, 7 Minute Order,,, Motions Submitted/Under Advisement,, by Robert Lawrence. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Nakano, Jarrod)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) The hearing on the pending motion to dismiss #4 , currently set for April 30, 2019, is VACATED. The Court has been informed by Plaintiffs' counsel that despite being registered for electronic service, they did not receive notice of the motion. On or before noon on April 30, 2019, Plaintiffs shall either file a stipulation setting a new briefing schedule or a request for an extension of time pursuant to Local Rule 144. If nothing is filed by that deadline, the Court will treat the motion as unopposed and will rule on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 25, 2019. (Munoz, I)
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) As a Motion to Dismiss, document #4 , has been noticed for hearing on 4/30/2019 before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, the Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 5/16/2019 is CONTINUED and will now be held on 7/11/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The Court grants telephonic appearances, with each party wishing to so appear directed to use the following dial-in number and passcode: 1-888-251-2909; passcode 1024453. The parties are also reminded to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the conference and email a copy of same, in Word format, to epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov, for the Judge's review. Minute Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/2/2019. (Rooney, M)
April 1, 2019 Filing 5 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in re #4 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 and 2)(Trader, Bryan)
April 1, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to DISMISS by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Trader, Bryan)
March 11, 2019 Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending TIme to Respond to Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Attorney Trader, Bryan David added. (Trader, Bryan)
March 5, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/16/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S)
March 4, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Superior Court Of California, County of Tulare, case number 277084 by Robert Lawrence. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8140459) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through C, #2 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons, #3 Notice of Related Cases and Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proof of Service)(Shah, Raagini)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Raagini Rashmi Shah
Represented By: Bryan David Trader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First American Title Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lawrence
Represented By: Jarrod Yutaka Nakano
Represented By: Timothy G. McFarlin
Represented By: Jarrod Y. Nakano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?