Mondrian et al v. Trius Trucking, Inc.
Rhonda Jones and Augustus Mondrian |
Trius Trucking, Inc. |
1:2019cv00884 |
June 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dale A Drozd |
Sheila K Oberto |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Victoria Bree Rivapalacio on behalf of Rhonda Jones, Augustus Mondrian. Attorney Rivapalacio, Victoria Bree added. (Rivapalacio, Victoria) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Ruchira Piya Mukherjee on behalf of Rhonda Jones, Augustus Mondrian. Attorney Mukherjee, Ruchira Piya added. (Mukherjee, Ruchira) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Trius Trucking, Inc.. (Fitzgerald, Irene) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Trius Trucking, Inc. (Fitzgerald, Irene) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Fresno, case number 16CECG01501 by Trius Trucking, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8334565) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit)(Fitzgerald, Irene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.