(PC) Cruz v. Savoie
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz |
S. Savoie |
1:2019cv01024 |
July 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Lawrence J O'Neill |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 **Plaintiff's Address Updated to Pelican Bay State Prison, PO Box 7500, Crescent City, CA 95532, as Per Notice of Change of Address filed in Case No. 1:19-cv-01270-DAD-SAB. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to #3 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING #3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Requiring Payment of Filing Fee in Full within Twenty-One Days, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/19/2019. (21-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to the Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/16/2019. Objections to F&R due 45-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion for Extension served on Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, served on Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS #3 by Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 5 MOTION for 45-Day EXTENSION OF TIME to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations, by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 3 ORDER to Assign Case to District Court; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED and Plaintiff be Required to Pay the Filing Fee in Full re #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/2/2019. This case has been assigned to Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson. The new case number is 1:19-cv-01024-LJO-JDP (PC). Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations served on Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Flores, E) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against S. Savoie by Guillermo Trujillo Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PC) Cruz v. Savoie | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: S. Savoie | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Guillermo Trujillo Cruz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.