Robertson v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.
| John Robertson |
| Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
| 1:2019cv01052 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Consumer Credit |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/20/2019. The Court, having duly considered the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 10), as set forth above, and for good cause shown, orders Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, extended to October 3, 2019. (Gonzales, V)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for extending time to respond to complaint by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Hamilton, Cindy) |
|
Filing 9
CONSENT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE for all purposes to Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/11/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Hamilton, Cindy) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Certificate of Service)(Hamilton, Cindy) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint by Chase Bank USA, N.A.. Attorney Hamilton, Cindy added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Hamilton, Cindy) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Chase Bank USA, N.A. served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by John Robertson. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Chase Bank USA, N.A.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nicholas J. Bontrager* *6464 W. Sunset Blvd.* *Suite 960* *Los Angeles, CA 90028*. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chase Bank USA, N.A. by John Robertson. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8379980) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robertson v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chase Bank USA, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Cindy Hamilton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Robertson | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas J. Bontrager |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
