(HC) Harris v. Montgomery
Petitioner: Patrick Darnell Harris
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery
Case Number: 1:2019cv01430
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale A Drozd
Referring Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The new case number is: 1:19-cv-01430-DAD-SKO (HC). (Orozco, A)
December 3, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Krenzin, Tami)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT Consent or Decline due by 1/6/2020 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/3/2019. (Orozco, A)
October 16, 2019 Filing 8 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin, Attorney General's Office. (Jessen, A)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/16/2019. Respondent's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT to File a Response; ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Serve Documents on Attorney General signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/15/2019. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (Jessen, A)
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Patrick Darnell Harris. (Parker, Corey)
October 10, 2019 Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Flores, E)
October 9, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Patrick Darnell Harris (Parker, Corey)
October 9, 2019 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM by Patrick Darnell Harris re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Darnell Harris. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Parker, Corey)
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warren L. Montgomery by Patrick Darnell Harris. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number 0972-8508404) (Parker, Corey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Harris v. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warren L. Montgomery
Represented By: Tami M. Krenzin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Patrick Darnell Harris
Represented By: Corey Evan Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?