Alavardo-Ceballos v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, et al.
| Soledad Alavardo-Ceballos and Soledad Ceballos |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA), National Association |
| 1:2020cv00091 |
| January 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER in Light of Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/28/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Order re Consent, #3 VDRP) (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Equifax Information Services, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Sylvanna Uyen Le* *Law Offices of Robert S. Gitmeid & Associates* *2007 1/2 South Sherbourne Drive* *Los Angeles, CA 90034*. (Rivera, O) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC by Soledad Alavardo-Ceballos. Attorney Le, Sylvanna Uyen added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8677503) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-E)(Le, Sylvanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
