Creamer v. Sherer et al
| Bruce Warren Creamer |
| County of Tulare, City of Tulare, State of California, United States of America and Susie Sherer |
| 1:2020cv00293 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Long Form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Long Form IFP Application). (Jessen, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Bruce Warren Creamer. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Bruce Warren Creamer. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Non-Prisoner) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Order, served on Bruce Warren Creamer. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Tulare, County of Tulare, Susie Sherer, State of California, United States of America by Bruce Warren Creamer. (Jessen, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
