(SS) Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
Carlos Garica and Carlos Garcia |
Commissioner of Social Security |
1:2020cv00924 |
July 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 11/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form, #3 USM Social Security Instructions) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to Issue Summons, Social Security Case Documents, and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/26/2020. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/6/2020. CASE STAYED. (Hall, S) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Carlos Garica. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Carlos Garica. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Lundstrom, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.