(PC) Shanks v. Mendez et al
| Darren Shanks |
| E. Mendez and D. Lopez |
| 1:2020cv01083 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING #14 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/21/2020. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #15 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Darren Shanks. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Darren Shanks. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 13
SCREENING ORDER granting Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint or notify the Court of intent to proceed on claim found to be cognizable signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/9/2020. First Amended Complaint due within 30-Days. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 Screening Order served on Darren Shanks. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's #10 Notice of Correction signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/21/2020. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order served on Darren Shanks. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS by Darren Shanks.Address Remains the Same. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE RE Correction of Document #4 by Darren Shanks. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 8
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Darren Shanks (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Darren Shanks. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 6
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Darren Shanks (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on Kern Valley State Prison. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/5/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Darren Shanks, CDC V-54842 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Darren Shanks. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against D. Lopez, E. Mendez by Darren Shanks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sant Agata, S)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
