(PC)Ouphthame v. Frauenheim et al
Plaintiff: Laja Ouphthame
Defendant: CDCR, Scott Frauenheim and Chinomso
Case Number: 1:2020cv01137
Filed: August 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary S Austin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Send Plaintiff Regular Civil IFP Application and REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Regular Civil IFP Application or Pay Filing Fee in Full within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Non-Prisoner IFP Form)(Sant Agata, S)
October 8, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order, served on Laja Ouphthame. (Sant Agata, S)
September 16, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to 635 N. Thesta Street, Apt. 102, Fresno, CA 93701 by Laja Ouphthame. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 16, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin-Gill, S)
September 16, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Laja Ouphthame. (Martin-Gill, S)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP App & Instructions) (Marrujo, C)
August 20, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, served on Laja Ouphthame. (Marrujo, C)
August 14, 2020 Filing 3 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on Corcoran State Prison. (Sant Agata, S)
August 14, 2020 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/14/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 9/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Sant Agata, S)
August 14, 2020 Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Laja Ouphthame. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sant Agata, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC)Ouphthame v. Frauenheim et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laja Ouphthame
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chinomso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?